In the following paragraphs, I will try to summarize the five most common issues I encounter with corporate websites from an SEO perspective. I would estimate that 80% of the websites I am asked to evaluate (either because they are clients, competitors of clients, or potential new prospects) suffer from at least four out of five of these issues.
So why is this information useful? Well, if you work in digital marketing for a corporation, this is a grab bag of effective corporate SEO topics to bring to the table. If you work in an agency, this is a quick check-list of problem points to look for on a prospective client’s site to show them the kind of expertise you can quickly deliver.
1. URL Canonicalization
In the history of my experience working with corporate SEO, I have only encountered a few corporate sites not suffering from rampant canonicalization issues. URL canonicalization is the process of insuring that a consistent URL (the “canonical” URL) is presented to search engines for each page, to avoid the perception of having duplicate versions of the same page content on your website. The problem with having multiple URLs for a page is that link equity is not consolidated between them. And if it’s the case that search engines believe you have a ton of duplicate content on your site, they may perceive your site to be of low quality. Here are three common canonicalization issues we see:
- The homepage is reachable at a variety of URLs, like: example.com, example.com/home, example.com/english/home, example.com/home.php
- The entire website functions with or without the www subdomain: example.com and www.example.com both bring up the homepage without any redirection.
- URLs working with or without a trailing slash: example.com/products and example.com/products/
The reason this is such a prevalent issue is because it is so subtle. Website designers are typically focused on the user experience of the website, and the URLs only play a small role in this. But in some cases canonicalization issues can drastically affect the SEO of the entire site.
2. Diluted Title Tags
There is a strong tendency for corporations to include their brand (and sometimes even their slogan) in every title tag, no matter the length. This causes dilution of any keywords included in the title tag. For instance, consider the inclusion of keywords “Widgets” and “Gizmos” in the following two title tags:
“Widgets & Gizmos”
vs.
“Widgets & Gizmos | Example Corp: Bringing you Turn-key Theoretical Instances since 1945″
Google doesn’t really know for sure which of these words represent the topic of the page (they may have some idea based on where the words lie in the title tag, but it’s far from perfect). In either case, it is certainly a best practice to minimize extraneous words in title tags.
In some instances, we’ve encountered clients whose legal departments have required them to include at least the brand name on every page. If this is the case, we still always recommend using the shortest version of the brand name allowable.
3. Rampant Micro-siting
In large corporations with a handful of business units, it’s very common for marketing folks in each BU to desire complete control over their own website. Either they feel they know the people in their vertical (or horizontal) in a way such that a tailored website would be beneficial, or they just want the agility to make large changes at a pace they don’t feel corporate marketing could keep up with. In some other cases, marketers want to create micro-sites for an event or webinar they are hosting, a blog, or a new product launch.
We’re always supportive of creating new fresh content that is helpful to your visitors. But the problem comes in when business units go wild creating new top level domains or sub-domains for everything under the sun. This is an issue because any links pointed towards that new top-level domain aren’t counted towards your main website (and only a fraction of the equity of links pointing towards a subdomain counts towards the main top-level domain). This is a missed opportuntity from an SEO perspective, especially if the topic of the microsite is something press-worthy or social share-worthy.
4. Lack of Parseable content
The vast majority of corporate websites we look at lack substantial parseable content. Because internal resources aren’t allocated towards writing original content for the website (and also because most content has to be reviewed by a variety of department, ranging from legal to PR), most corporation fail to include more than 150 words of content on important landing pages. This results in fewer opportunities for keyword or optimized link inclusion. Ideally an important landing page should have a minimum of 300-400 words of content. This can be further calibrated by examining pages that are ranking above the fold and seeing how much content is on their pages.
5. Sloppy Website Transition Redirects
At some time or another (at least every 2-3 years), a given corporation will launch a new website. This is often to reflect a merger or an acquisition, or sometimes just a new marketing executive who wants to make a splash. In any case, it seems more common than not that the webmasters responsible for the website transition will do one or more of the following:
- fail to implement redirects from old website URLs to new website URLs
- redirect all old URLs to the new website homepage
- use 302 redirects (which don’t pass any link value) instead of 301 redirects.
Any given one of these is likely to have a drastic negative impact on non-branded organic rank and traffic. There’s nothing like a drop in traffic and leads to signal the failure of a new website launch. We encourage corporate webmasters to take the time to individually map out 301 redirects for as many old website URLs as possible; it can be worth delaying a website launch for another few days in order to do things right.
Well that’s my top 5 for corporate SEO. Please leave a comment or email me with questions!




















